Predestination’s Dark Legacy: How Calvinism Justified Empire, Capitalism, and Surveillance
Divine Selection, Earthly Dominion: How Calvinist Predestination Shaped Western Power Structures
Published on May 2, 2025 |by bleuetoile
In the gathering darkness of late-stage capitalism and imperial decline, we must excavate the theological foundations upon which our social order rests. The Calvinist doctrine of predestination—with its divine sorting of humanity into the “elect” and the “reprobate”—transcended its spiritual origins to become the essential ideological skeleton supporting five centuries of Western domination. As Noam Chomsky observes, “The most effective forms of domination hide in plain sight, embedding themselves in the very frameworks through which we understand reality.” Predestination has achieved this with devastating efficiency—structuring not merely religious institutions but the underlying architecture of Western imperial ideology, colonial violence, economic extraction, and global governance.
This doctrine provides the perfect theological armor for empire: a cosmic justification for earthly hierarchies that places them beyond critique or resistance. When inequality is rendered as divine decree rather than human construction, the dominated are taught to see their subjugation as theologically inevitable rather than politically reversible. In the words of Chris Hedges, “The danger is not that a particular class is unfit to govern. Every class is unfit to govern.” Yet predestination created precisely this unfitness myth on a global scale—some nations, races, and peoples were preordained to rule, while others were destined for subjection.
The Evolution of Predestinarian Logic: 400 Years of Divine Sorting
c. 400: Augustine’s Foundation
First systematizes predestination in On the Predestination of the Saints, arguing grace is irresistible and salvation predetermined
1536: Calvin’s Institutes
Establishes double predestination (elect/reprobate) as core Reformed doctrine
1618-1619: Synod of Dort
Codifies TULIP principles, including Unconditional Election and Limited Atonement
1630: Puritan Migration
John Winthrop declares Massachusetts Bay a “City upon a Hill” for the elect
1857: Dutch Reformed Synod
Formalizes racial segregation theology later used to justify apartheid
1944: Bretton Woods
IMF/World Bank establish global economic hierarchy mirroring elect/reprobate logic
2023: FICO Scoring
850-point credit system replicates theological election with algorithmic precision
2024: AI Hiring Algorithms
Amazon’s recruitment AI systematically downgraded resumes containing words like “women’s” (e.g., “women’s chess club captain”)
The Metaphysics of Power: Predestination’s Core Logic
Before examining predestination’s secular manifestations, we must understand its theological genesis. The doctrine represents a profound deviation from early Christian egalitarianism. In the Gospels, Jesus of Nazareth preached radical inclusion—”Come unto me, all ye that labor and are heavy laden” (Matthew 11:28). His ministry centered the marginalized, challenged established hierarchies, and offered salvation to “whosoever believes” without precondition. The early church reflected this ethos, emphasizing community, shared resources, and the spiritual equality of all believers.
Augustine’s formulation of predestination in the fifth century began a theological pivot that would reach its zenith in John Calvin’s systematic theology of the 1500s. By then, the doctrine had solidified into an uncompromising determinism: God had, before the foundation of the world, selected some souls for salvation and others for damnation—a divine sorting beyond human influence, merit, or agency. As Calvin wrote in his Institutes of the Christian Religion:
“By predestination we mean the eternal decree of God, by which He determined with Himself whatever He wished to happen with regard to every man. All are not created on equal terms, but some are preordained to eternal life, others to eternal damnation.”
This doctrine established the fundamental cognitive framework that would prove devastatingly effective for imperial projects: the world is naturally divided between the chosen and the unchosen, and this division is both divinely ordained and unalterable by human agency. As Shoshana Zuboff might characterize it, predestination established “a new logic of extraction” not merely of spiritual certainty, but eventually of lands, peoples, resources, and data.
The theological move from “salvation available to all who choose it” to “salvation predetermined for a select few” cannot be overstated in its sociopolitical implications. It transferred moral agency from human beings to a distant deity, rendering the most brutal earthly hierarchies as mere reflections of a predetermined cosmic order. In such a framework, resistance to power becomes not merely politically dangerous but theologically blasphemous—a rebellion against divine will itself.
The Jesus/Calvin Divergence: A Theological Fork in the Road
The contrast between Jesus’ ministry and Calvinist predestination represents one of history’s most consequential theological divergences. Where Jesus emphasized human moral agency, compassion for outcasts, and accessibility to divine presence, Calvinism emphasized human depravity, divine inscrutability, and the predetermined nature of salvation. This shift wasn’t merely theological hairsplitting; it represented a fundamental reconception of humanity’s relationship to power—both divine and earthly.
Jesus consistently undermined hierarchies based on race, gender, and social status: “There is neither Jew nor Greek, slave nor free, male nor female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus” (Galatians 3:28). His parables often centered those deemed unworthy by existing religious authorities—Samaritans, tax collectors, women with suspicious reputations—and positioned them as moral exemplars. This theological framework provided scant justification for systems of domination.
Calvinist predestination, by contrast, sanctified hierarchy. If God had eternally divided humanity into saved and damned categories before creation itself, then temporal social divisions could be interpreted as mere shadows of this cosmic sorting. As Chris Hedges notes in his critique of American exceptionalism, “Moral nihilism always accompanies imperialism.” Predestination provided the perfect theological cover for this nihilism—God had already sorted humanity, so colonial powers were merely acting as instruments of divine categorization.
The bitter irony is that Calvin’s theology, intended to elevate God’s sovereignty, became weaponized to justify human tyranny. The doctrine meant to humble human pride became the theological foundation for unprecedented human arrogance—the claim that certain people, nations, and races were divinely commissioned to rule over others.
The Protestant Ethic and the Machinery of Capitalism
The economic implications of predestination received their most incisive analysis in Max Weber’s groundbreaking work, “The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism.” Weber identified the psychological mechanics through which a spiritual doctrine transformed material relations: predestinarian anxiety—the gnawing uncertainty about one’s salvation status—generated an obsessive search for signs of election. Material success and disciplined productivity became interpreted as evidence of divine favor, transforming economic accumulation into a form of spiritual reassurance.
The implications were profound and far-reaching. As Weber wrote:
“The religious valuation of restless, continuous, systematic work in a worldly calling, as the highest means of asceticism, and at the same time the surest and most evident proof of rebirth and genuine faith, must have been the most powerful conceivable lever for the expansion of… the spirit of capitalism.”
This theological-economic fusion created what Norman Solomon might call a “manufactured consent” to capitalist exploitation—where even the exploited could interpret their condition not as systemic injustice but as divine judgment. The poor were not merely economically disadvantaged; they were potentially marked by divine rejection. The wealthy were not merely privileged; they were potentially marked by divine selection. Economic hierarchy thus acquired a spiritual veneer that immunized it against moral critique.
Calvinism’s work ethic, combined with its predestinationist framework, created the perfect spiritual soil for capitalism to flourish—a religious worldview that sanctified inequality, valorized accumulation, and interpreted poverty as moral failure rather than structural violence. As Chris Hedges observes in “America: The Farewell Tour,” “We have built a political and economic system based on the unrestrained workings of the market and the commodification of human beings.” This system found its theological justification in the predestinarian worldview, where divine election manifested in material success and economic failure signaled divine rejection.
The enduring legacy of this theological-economic fusion can be seen in contemporary prosperity gospel preaching, neoliberal economic policy, and the persistent American myth that poverty reflects moral failure rather than systemic design. When politicians speak of “job creators” versus “takers,” they are deploying secularized versions of a theological framework that sorted humanity into elect and reprobate categories centuries ago.
By the Numbers: Algorithmic Predestination
82% of Fortune 500 companies use AI screening that automatically rejects applicants with “gaps” in employment history (Harvard Business Review 2021)
2.7x higher likelihood of Black mortgage applicants being denied than white applicants with identical credit scores (CFPB 2023)
400% increase in “risk score” premiums for Latino-majority ZIP codes (ProPublica 2022)
These disparities function as digital reprobation—systemic exclusion masked as technical neutrality.
Colonial Ventures as Divine Commission
When European powers launched their colonial projects in the Americas, Africa, and Asia, predestinarian logic provided the perfect theological justification. The “chosen people” narrative—borrowed from particular readings of Hebrew scripture but recast through Calvinist predestination—allowed colonizers to view their conquests as fulfillment of divine will rather than acts of violent dispossession. This “chosen people” concept, deeply intertwined with notions of divine favor and historical destiny, became a potent tool in the hands of colonizers.
As Norman Finkelstein has demonstrated in his analysis of theological justifications for land appropriation, selective biblical interpretation often serves as cover for naked power grabs. Colonial ventures from New England to South Africa were cast as “errand[s] into the wilderness”—divine missions to bring order to chaos, salvation to the heathen, and civilization to the “unelect.” The Puritans, strict Calvinists who colonized North America, viewed their project explicitly through this lens—they were establishing a “city upon a hill,” a new Jerusalem in what they perceived as untamed wilderness despite its indigenous inhabitants.
This theological framework transformed what might otherwise be recognized as theft, genocide, and cultural destruction into a sacred mission. If God had already divided humanity into saved and damned categories, then the subjugation of indigenous peoples could be interpreted not as violence but as divine plan unfolding. In a chilling parallel to our current era, Chris Hedges notes, “We all have the capacity for evil. It is not always dormant.” Predestination didn’t create colonial violence, but it provided its theological justification, transforming monstrous acts into divinely sanctioned necessities.
The Massachusetts Bay Colony’s seal depicted a Native American saying “Come over and help us”—a stunning example of how predestinarian thought recast conquest as salvific mission. The “White Man’s Burden” was not merely a poetic conceit but a logical extension of a theology that had already divided humanity into the saved and the damned before time began. When Rudyard Kipling urged colonizers to “Fill full the mouth of Famine and bid the sickness cease,” he was drawing on centuries of theological justification that positioned certain peoples as divinely commissioned saviors and others as objects of salvation or destruction. The concept of the “civilizing mission,” deeply embedded in the colonial mindset, further reinforced this hierarchical worldview.
The theological logic that sanctified conquest continued long after its explicitly religious articulations faded. As Noam Chomsky observes, “The naive might call this ‘hypocrisy,’ but more accurately, it is institutionalized deception essential to political systems of power and domination.” The language shifted from theological to scientific, from “God’s will” to “civilizing mission” to “development” to “humanitarian intervention”—but the underlying structure remained: some peoples were destined to rule, others to be ruled. This transition from overtly religious justifications to seemingly secular ones demonstrates the enduring power of the underlying hierarchical framework established by predestinarian thought.
Case Study: Dutch Reformed Theology and Apartheid
The 1857 Synod of the Dutch Reformed Church declared:
“Although the heathen stand on a lower level of civilization… they should be received into separate congregations.”
This theological framework:
Became official apartheid policy in 1948
Justified segregated churches until 1990
Inspired similar racial theology in American Southern Baptist churches
As historian T.D. Moodie notes in The Rise of Afrikanerdom, this was “Calvin’s Geneva reborn as racial fortress—a theological warrant for Herrenvolk ideology.”
Predestination and the Construction of Racial Hierarchy
Perhaps nowhere is predestination’s legacy more evident—and more devastating—than in the construction of racial hierarchies that continue to structure global power relations. The theological sorting of humanity into elect and reprobate categories provided the ideological framework for the racial categorization that would emerge during European colonial expansion.
Theological scholar Willie James Jennings argues in “The Christian Imagination: Theology and the Origins of Race” that the modern concept of race evolved alongside colonial theological frameworks. Predestination’s cosmic division of humanity into saved and damned categories made it easier to conceptualize temporal divisions along racial lines. If God had already sorted souls before birth, why not sort bodies by visible markers?
This theological-racial framework reached its most explicit articulation in the “Curse of Ham” narrative—a selective reading of Genesis 9 that was used to justify African enslavement. While not exclusively Calvinist, this interpretation found fertile ground in predestinarian soil. If certain peoples were predestined for subjugation, their enslavement was not a moral crime but simply the temporal manifestation of an eternal decree.
As Chris Hedges argues, “The danger of the fundamentalist belief system is that it allows its adherents to project their internal meanness, intolerance and greed onto the world.” Predestination created a perfect theological architecture for this projection—allowing the ugliest human impulses toward domination to be recast as divine mandate. The legacy of this “projection” is profound, shaping social structures and perpetuating inequality across generations.
The enduring power of this theological-racial framework is evident in the persistence of white supremacist movements that continue to draw on religious justifications. From the Ku Klux Klan’s burning crosses to contemporary Christian nationalism, the theological sanctification of racial hierarchy persists. Even as explicit theological language fades from public discourse, the underlying structure remains—a cosmic justification for earthly divisions that places them beyond political remedy. This persistence highlights the insidious nature of ideologies that become deeply embedded in a culture’s worldview.
Predestination’s Legacy in Global Governance
The aftermath of World War II saw the establishment of global governance institutions ostensibly committed to universal human rights and international cooperation. Yet even here, predestinarian logic lurked beneath the surface. The United Nations Security Council’s permanent membership, the Bretton Woods institutions, and subsequent neoliberal global order all reflected a hierarchical worldview where certain nations were positioned as natural leaders while others were positioned as natural followers.
As Chris Hedges has observed: “The rhetoric of humanitarian intervention, democracy promotion, and economic development often masks the same old imperial power arrangements.” The world order constructed by Western powers after 1945 institutionalized a form of global predestination, where the “developed” nations were positioned as elect guides for the “developing” world—a distinction that carried moral weight far beyond mere economic metrics.
This global sorting mirrors the theological sorting at the heart of predestination—some nations are chosen for prosperity and leadership; others are consigned to poverty and followership. As Adom Getachew argues in her analysis of postcolonial international relations, “Worldmaking after Empire: The Rise and Fall of Self-Determination,” decolonization struggles were not merely about political independence but about challenging this predetermined world order that positioned some nations as inherently sovereign and others as inherently dependent.
The International Monetary Fund and World Bank—institutions dominated by Western powers—operate through economic mechanisms that mirror predestinarian logic: some nations are deemed creditworthy, responsible, and fit for prosperity; others are deemed risky, irresponsible, and in need of discipline. These seemingly technical designations carry profound moral weight that echoes the theological division between elect and reprobate.
In his searing critique of international financial institutions, Joseph Stiglitz notes how developing nations are often forced into economic arrangements that privilege Western interests—a secular manifestation of a theological framework that predetermined certain peoples for subordination. As Chris Hedges puts it, “We have built systems of governance that are incapable of addressing the existential threats we have created.” The consequences of these systems are far-reaching, perpetuating global inequalities and hindering sustainable development.
IMF Loan Conditions as Divine Decree
2023 IMF requirements for Ghana:
Cut electricity subsidies (affecting 5.4 million poor households)
Freeze public sector hiring (in nation with 14% unemployment)
Privatize water systems (leading to 300% price increases in Accra)
As Joseph Stiglitz observes: “The language of fiscal responsibility masks a theology of market fundamentalism.”
Christian Zionism and Geopolitical Predestination
Perhaps nowhere is the continuing influence of predestinarian thought more evident than in Christian Zionism—particularly its American evangelical variety. Here, predestination has been married to apocalyptic expectation, creating a potent theological justification for unconditional support of the state of Israel regardless of its actions toward Palestinians.
The conviction that the Jewish people remain God’s chosen, with a predestined role to play in end-times prophecy, has translated into billions in foreign aid, diplomatic protection, and geopolitical cover. As in colonial ventures of earlier centuries, the rights and humanity of Palestinians are rendered secondary to a divine plan that has already sorted peoples into their proper roles and places. This theological framework transforms what might otherwise be recognized as occupation, apartheid, and ethnic cleansing into necessary steps in a predestined divine drama.
A 2017 LifeWay poll found that 80% of evangelical Christians believed the creation of Israel in 1948 fulfilled biblical prophecy—a statistic with profound implications for Middle Eastern geopolitics, given evangelical influence on U.S. foreign policy. When politicians like former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo suggest that God raised Donald Trump to protect Israel, they are drawing on this predestinarian framework that positions certain political actors as divine instruments in a predetermined cosmic drama.
As Chris Hedges warns in “American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America,” “The danger is not that fundamentalists will someday establish a theocracy in America. It is that the ideology of the Christian Right is being used to strip citizens of rights and create a system of tyranny that will cater to the power elite.” The predestinarian logic of Christian Zionism contributes to this danger, positioning certain geopolitical arrangements as divinely ordained and therefore beyond critique or revision.
The tragic irony is that this theological framework distorts both Judaism and Christianity, reducing complex religious traditions to predetermined roles in an apocalyptic drama. It renders the actual living, breathing Jewish people secondary to their symbolic role in Christian eschatology—another form of theological objectification with roots in predestinarian thought.
Surveillance Capitalism: Digital Predestination
In our algorithmic age, predestinarian logic has found perhaps its most perfect secular expression in what Shoshana Zuboff calls “surveillance capitalism.” The collection and analysis of behavioral data to predict and influence human action represents a technological manifestation of the same sorting impulse at the heart of predestination—dividing humanity into categories based on predetermined criteria.
“Just as industrial capitalism was driven to the continuous intensification of the labor process,” Zuboff writes in “The Age of Surveillance Capitalism,” “surveillance capitalism drives the intensification of the behavioral data collection and specification processes.” The algorithmic determination of which individuals will see which advertisements, receive which loan offers, qualify for which jobs, or be flagged for police attention represents a technological predestination as consequential as its theological predecessor.
Credit scores, risk assessments, predictive policing algorithms, and personalized pricing models all function as secular mechanisms of predestination—sorting humanity into categories of value and risk based on factors often beyond individual control. As in Calvin’s theology, these algorithmic judgments are often invisible, inscrutable, and effectively predetermined by factors established before an individual’s relevant choices. The opaqueness of these systems further reinforces their power, making it difficult for individuals to challenge or resist the categories they are placed in.
Chris Hedges notes, “In an age of technological integration and penetration into every aspect of our lives, the tyranny is invisible.” The algorithms that determine who gets a mortgage, who gets arrested, who gets hired, and who sees which news operate as invisible systems of predestination—sorting humanity into categories of privilege and disadvantage with all the force but none of the transparency of their theological predecessor.
Indeed, the language of contemporary data science often echoes predestinarian theology with unsettling precision. We speak of “predictive analytics” determining individual “propensities”—a secular version of divine foreknowledge determining individual destiny. The theological doctrine that once sorted souls into salvation or damnation now sorts consumers into “high value” or “high risk” categories with consequences nearly as profound for their earthly lives. This “digital predestination” raises critical ethical questions about fairness, justice, and human agency in an increasingly data-driven world.
The Invisible Architecture of Power
The most effective ideologies are those that become invisible—so deeply embedded in social structures that they appear as natural law rather than human constructs. Predestination has achieved this status. Though few contemporary global institutions explicitly reference Calvinist theology, its logic of pre-ordained hierarchy, divine selection, and unequal spiritual value has been secularized into the very foundations of modern power relations.
From algorithmic decision-making that sorts populations into categories of risk and reward to immigration policies that separate the “deserving” from the “undeserving” migrant, to international bodies that classify nations into “developed” and “developing” categories—the sorting logic of predestination continues to shape our world. As Shoshana Zuboff might argue, the “divine right” to classify and sort has simply been transferred from the theological realm to the technological, financial, and geopolitical.
What makes this ideology so enduring is precisely what made the original doctrine so powerful: it naturalizes inequality. If the cosmos itself was designed with fundamental, unchangeable hierarchies of value, then earthly hierarchies merely reflect,rather than violate, divine order. When inequality is rendered cosmic rather than constructed, resistance appears not merely difficult but blasphemous—a rebellion against the very order of creation. This naturalization of inequality is a key mechanism through which dominant power structures maintain their legitimacy and perpetuate themselves.
As Chris Hedges reminds us, “The most important element that empowers totalitarianism is the collusion of the intellectuals within a society.” The theological intellectuals who developed predestination could hardly have imagined how their doctrine would be weaponized to justify centuries of domination, extraction, and violence. Yet their theological framework provided the perfect scaffolding for imperial projects that required precisely this kind of moral anesthesia. Today’s technocrats, economists, and policymakers may be equally unaware of how their seemingly seculardecisions perpetuate a logic of sorting and hierarchy with deep theological roots.
To confront the challenges of our time—from ecological collapse to obscene inequality to the resurgence of white supremacist movements—we must first recognize the invisible architecture of power that shapes our world. And that architecture, I argue, bears the indelible imprint of a theological doctrine that divided humanity into the chosen and the damned centuries before the rise of capitalism, colonialism, or the digital age.
Bibliography
Finkelstein, Norman. *Image and Reality of the Israel-Palestine Conflict*.
Getachew, Adom. *Worldmaking after Empire: The Rise and Fall of Self-Determination*.
Hedges, Chris. *American Fascists: The Christian Right and the War on America*.
Jennings, Willie James. *The Christian Imagination: Theology and the Origins of Race*.
LifeWay Research. *2017 LifeWay Poll on Evangelical Beliefs about Israel*.
Weber, Max. *The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism*.
Robinson, Cedric J. *Black Marxism: The Making of the Black Radical Tradition*.